Gov. Romney on Nightline (VIDEO)


This was the interview that Mitt Romney did on January 29, 2007 with ABC’s Nightline.

When the inevitable Mormon question comes up, he says that the US Constitution would come first, if he were President, in response to the question regarding the Mormon Prophet having the final word or trying to influence him in any way. Mitt does however admit that he is a “TRUE-BELIEVING Mormon” and “very proud of his heritage.” He doesn’t want to look “weird” or “peculiar”, rather normal, which is hard to do when you are a Mormon running for President.

Utahs coverage of the interview below (click here for the transcript):

McCain Courts Wary Bloggers

McCain

Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., is not popular with many conservative bloggers and their readers. How will this play in his 2008 aspirations? CBS News observes that Presidential campaigns, even in their infancy, are already working on building rapport with political blogs — the constantly updated, often highly-partisan Web sites where authors post news updates, opinion pieces and everything in between. From CBSNEWS.com:

The relationship between candidates and the blogosphere is an important one, but sometimes uneasy. If bloggers and their readers feel slighted or ignored by a candidate, retribution can be harsh. But blogs will also help candidates they favor with organization and fundraising.

The candidates’ outreach efforts vary. Candidates will sometimes serve as guest-bloggers on more popular sites. Other campaigns, like those of Democrats Hillary Clinton and John Edwards, have hired popular bloggers to work for them.

But those strategies can sometimes backfire, as evidenced this week, when Edwards faced questions over comments two of his bloggers had posted on an outside Web site that criticized the Catholic Church, drawing the ire of conservative groups. The story, of course, has been the hot topic on political blogs of all stripes for the past two days. Edwards decided to keep the bloggers on his staff and both issued apologies.

Republican John McCain’s campaign faces a different problem: Despite leading in polls of GOP primary voters, many conservative bloggers don’t like him and don’t trust him.

In particular, they take issue with the campaign finance overhaul law he co-sponsored in 2002. A frequent complaint on blogs is that the measure curtails free speech and — hitting closer to home — contains provisions that threatened to severely restrict the activity of political blogs.

McCain also took heat from blog readers when he joined a bipartisan group to prevent a Senate rules change that would have ended filibusters on judicial nominees, and many are wary of him because, they say, he is too friendly with the “MSM” — mainstream media.

Will another white male be elected president in 2008?

Barack Obama. Hillary Rodham Clinton. Bill Richardson. The field of minority and female candidates for president has never been so strong. But the question remains: Despite the expected presence of an African- American, a woman, and a Latino, will America in 2008 elect yet another male president of northern European descent? Such is the question from the Christian Science Monitor.

The indicators of change are encouraging. A 2005 poll by Siena Research Institute/Hearst Newspapers showed that 81 percent of respondents would vote for a female candidate. And a CBS News/New York Times poll from early last year found that nearly all Americans say they would vote for a woman for president from their own political party if she were qualified.

Had former Secretary of State Colin Powell run for president in 1996, he might have won. That’s what both Hugh Price, then president of the National Urban League, and Robert Woodson Sr., president of the Center for Neighborhood Enterprise, said in a PBS “African American World” program.

“The opportunities for female and minority candidates have increased,” says political scientist Thomas Carsey of Florida State University. “Barriers are breaking down at a broad level in society, and this is happening in politics as well.”

Today, female and minority candidates, he notes, are more likely to win state-level elections and succeed in the private sector – achievements that can be among the steppingstones to the presidency. They also have improved access to the nominating process, which is more open, Carsey adds.

“I don’t think it’s a stretch at all to imagine that we might have a female president or a person of color as president,” adds Calvin Exoo, professor of government at St. Lawrence University.

Both Democratic and Republican pollsters have expressed similar sentiments.

Dem rivals set to go nuclear on Obama

Obama

In interviews, strategists in both parties pointed to four big vulnerabilities: Obama’s inexperience, the thinness of his policy record, his frank liberalism in a time when the party needs centrist voters, and the wealth of targets that are provided by the personal recollections in his first book, from past drug use to conversations that cannot be documented.

Beginning with his announcement for president on Saturday, the long knives will be out for Obama from three directions: Reporters, perpetuating the boom and bust cycle of a ravenous media culture, will try to make up for the fawning coverage of the past. Democratic rivals see him as the easiest mark among the major contenders, and want to get him out of the way. And some top Republicans think the party would have a better chance with Sen. Hillary Clinton as the nominee, since she is a known quantity while Obama can try to define himself as anything he wants.

Officials at the top of both parties calculate that Obama has risen too fast to sustain his popularity in the cauldron of a presidential campaign. Democrats talk of “vapid platitudes” that could produce a “soufflé effect” – an implosion as journalists and activists begin probing for substance behind Obama’s appealing promise of “a different kind of politics” and “a new kind of politics.”…

Says another top Democrat: “Once the shooting war starts, he’s not going to be able to get away with these grand pronouncements.”

That claim from the Politico, but as Allahpundit notes: None of the four “big” vulnerabilities is especially big. Clinton was inexperienced and had no foreign policy credentials when he was elected. The drug use actually works in Obama’s favor by playing up his biggest advantage, i.e., the fact that people can relate to him, unlike unctuous multimillionaire trial lawyer Lionel Hutz and the glacier you and I know as Hillary. His liberalism is problematic, but we’re not exactly in a golden age for conservatives; if the war sours, people might be ready for a deep blue candidate. If, that is, they vote according to his policies at all: I saw an article two days ago (which naturally I can’t find now) about how most voters vote according to the candidate’s visceral appeal, not his or her platform. Good news for Barry O, not so good for Mrs. Bubba.

Supporters plotting to draft Gore into 2008 run

Veterans of Al Gore’s past are quietly assembling a campaign to draft the former vice president into the 2008 presidential race — despite his repeated statements that he’s not running.

His top policy adviser from his 2000 presidential campaign and other key supporters met Thursday in Boston to mull a potential Gore campaign. The participants and Gore’s Nashville office both said Gore, who is in London, is not involved.

Elaine Kamarck, a veteran of the Clinton White House and Gore’s policy guru in 2000, said the meeting was informal and shouldn’t be taken as a sign there will be a Gore 2008 campaign.

Chris Mackin, a Boston consultant and Gore supporter, called it “an early stage conversation.” But he added: “We’re very serious about exploring this.”

Gore at CandidatesBlog.com

Gore’s spokeswoman, Kalee Kreider, said the only campaign Gore is on right now is against global warming.

“He so appreciates the sentiment behind efforts like this. But he’s been very clear he really has no intention of running for president in 2008,” she said.

Gore won a hard-fought primary campaign to become the Democratic nominee in 2000. He won the popular vote, but lost to President Bush after a messy legal challenge ultimately decided by the U.S. Supreme Court.

Since then, the former Tennessee senator has worked against global warming and served on corporate boards, including Google and Apple Inc. Due to a range of business ventures, aides have said Gore could spend as much as $50 million of his own money to launch a credible presidential run.

Continue reading at CNN (via the AP) >>